PussyCatDoll nomination??
Welcome to My Used Panty Portal! › Forums › Used Panty Related Discussion › Official Golden Panty Awards › PussyCatDoll nomination??
- This topic has 24 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 18 years ago by Kinky Kate.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 19, 2006 at 9:55 am #11363mikegukMember
PK,
I`ve just been looking at PussyCatDoll nominee page and i see that she is up for “seller of the year” award.
Well those who know me, know i like to checkout the NEW sellers here on PH, Well thats what i have just done.
After looking at her site (hoisting one) I see that she has only been selling for 315 days, so there for she can`t be up for seller of the year, I don`t want to rock the boat, but just want to make sure every one is up for the right awards.Mike
December 19, 2006 at 10:04 am #11364Cindy_PantyParadiseMemberNo disrespect to a fellow seller that suddenly popped up out of nowhere but how could anyone be nominated for such an award when they havent even taken time out to do something positive for the panty community. For example being Panty Trust Verified should be the first step to take!
The Golden Panty Seller of the Year Award isnt just about selling panties, its about freely contributing to the community and being recognised for your hard work and dedication to the industry as a whole, not just because you are hot! :huh:
I’m sorry PussyCatDoll but as far as I am concerned you should not be in the running for Golden Panty Seller 2006, and this is not sour grapes talking – if anyone really deserves it this year I feel it is Anna, but she hasn’t been selling for over a year yet so doesnt qualify unfortunately.. and I know my maths isnt great but 315 days is not a year either, however much you try and stretch it.
December 19, 2006 at 10:28 am #11365mikegukMemberOh thats a good point about being Panty Trust Verified. I know a few are not Panty Trust Verified here, but they have posted a lot within PH to get known, such like Kez & Rachy who have contributing a great deal to the community here on PH since becomming members.
MikeDecember 19, 2006 at 10:33 am #11366Cindy_PantyParadiseMemberexactly. Ive been in the industry for years and see girls come and go but I have to admit I have not heard about this particular girl ever .. AND I live in Germany :crazy2:
I know I don’t get on Panty Hog as much as I used to be but has she even posted here before? – does anybody know her so they can put me straight and let everyone know what greatness she has done for the community to deserve the title “Golden Panty Seller of the Year 2006”?Â
I mean, come on now, to nominate her for just being “hot hot hot” is totally irrelevant!:police:
December 19, 2006 at 10:45 am #11367Cindy_PantyParadiseMemberPK
The main Golden Panty Seller Award should only be made available to nominate those girls who are at least Panty Trust Verified to show some sort of dedication in the very least.
In fact in future years maybe this whole competition should be open to just Panty Hog, Ebare and Ebanned Members, and ALL voters MUST be a member here and must log in to vote. That way everything can be tracked and traced and nobody can get away with any manipulation.
December 19, 2006 at 11:48 am #11369FetishKittenMemberThat sounds like a plausible and sensible idea.
December 19, 2006 at 12:42 pm #11370Cindy_PantyParadiseMemberI see PK made the right decision and has amended the nomination.
:coolsmiley:
December 19, 2006 at 12:46 pm #11371mikegukMemberCindy,
His a good old boy really :cheer:Mike
December 19, 2006 at 12:50 pm #11373Cindy_PantyParadiseMember.. I think “fair” is the word you need :police:
December 19, 2006 at 1:01 pm #11375mikegukMemberI stand corrected then 😉
fair :police:December 19, 2006 at 2:54 pm #11385AnnaMember[quote author=Cindy_PantyParadise link=topic=1670.msg10562#msg10562 date=1166522689]
… Golden Panty Seller 2006, and this is not sour grapes talking – if anyone really deserves it this year I feel it is Anna, but she hasn’t been selling for over a year yet so doesnt qualify unfortunately..
Oh thank you sweetheart – that means hell of a lot coming from you. I really appreciate that sentiment.smt
I’m feeling fuzzy now
December 19, 2006 at 4:53 pm #11391adminKeymasterThank you for pointing that out Mike. I did amend the nomination because as you stated, this seller was not yet eligible for the Seller of The Year award. I check in as I’m getting ready to leave for work in the morning. I had just enough time this morning to make the change, but not enough time to comment until now. After this year’s Awards are wrapped up, we can talk about changes people would like to see for next year. This is how we went from one category last year to many this year.
😉 PK
December 19, 2006 at 5:50 pm #11394Cindy_PantyParadiseMemberI do have some ideas for next year and one of those will be that I don’t think that sellers should nominate other sellers. I know I nominated some other sellers myself this year, but overall it doesnt seem right somehow.
What do other sellers think about that rule (apart from nominating for the obvious categories .. eg: most helpful to new sellers etc., and those that directly affect other sellers)
Also (as I asked on another post too) what happens if someone is nominated for a category but she is the only one.
Does she win by default which seems a bit pointless really or will that category be nulled?
December 19, 2006 at 6:00 pm #11395FetishKittenMemberI liked nominating this year, but it was difficult in some catagories as we dont have a buyers eye view for some things.
December 19, 2006 at 6:03 pm #11396Delicious_JessMemberCan I second what Cindy said about sellers being void. And I was wondering about being the lone nominee in a catagory too? I’m not sure you can win it when you’re the only one there? :huh:
BTW PK, it looks like you’ve had your work cut out for you this year what with all the confusion and the pages going up and down being amended… you know we appreciate you, don’t you? :kiss: You’re such a trooper for doing this for us, especially as no one pays you!!!
smt
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.