very disturbing, please read and beware
Welcome to My Used Panty Portal! › Forums › Used Panty Related Discussion › General Panty Talk › very disturbing, please read and beware
- This topic has 29 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by Desire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:56 am #20776SerenaMember
To access the ebanned board you would need to set up an account which takes 48hrs… not that I think anyone should!!
If you wish to read the actual thread, I have a copy 😉… just ask! 😀
March 27, 2008 at 3:44 pm #20777FetishKittenMemberThis is terrible! This kind of thing needs to be told, so thankyou Solange, we’ll watch out and do everything we can to stop him and people like him.
I had a potential customer not long ago asking me if I sold little girl panties, and I told him NO. This was after a discussion by the sick twat that he’d been offered the panties of a womans daughter as well as her own. (cant remember if it was a sellers or random other person he knew)
He also asked if I thought it was wrong.Suspicious, I asked how old they were, and he eventually told me ones 15 and the other is 12. I said YES thats A) Illegal, and B) Sick not to mention a load of other things I told him none too polite.
Needless to say I blocked him, reported him, and actually made a post about it on pantyhog incase anyone else came across him.
And when I was still working in the porn shop, someone came into our store in Luton and asked our assistant if we sold porn with children in it I SHIT YOU NOT he asked directly. The assistant being rather quick witted said “No, but I know someone who can get it for you, just leave me your name and telephone number and i’ll pass it on to him…” The Sicko DID give his real name and phone number, and she managed to get his number plate on his car too before reporting him to the police. He got a swift knock on the door by the local police and too fucking RIGHT.
March 27, 2008 at 5:03 pm #20781anniMember“…The assistant being rather quick witted …”
That was the perfect way to deal with the situation…it’d be funny if it wasn’t so disturbibg.
March 27, 2008 at 6:09 pm #20786laculotteMemberSolange, Serena, although I already tried to register for the ebanned forum they still haven’ approved. So here’s my two cents on this. Should’ve been posted over there rather…
I read the cpy of the thread and find it sdisturbing that many of the sellers and buyers there actually defended wearing and / or preferring children’s underwear. I know even VS sells cute girly stuff with flowers and stuff on it, but advertising your panties as children’s is beyond the line which should be drawn in everybody’s head.
That was exactly the issue I had with the girl at the pantyhog auctions. Being small and petite and wearing ‘corresponding’ underwear is NOT the problem. It’s the way some girls advertise them. Please everybody mind your wording!
March 28, 2008 at 5:46 am #20788AnnaMemberlaculotte wrote:
Solange, Serena, although I already tried to register for the ebanned forum they still haven’ approved. So here’s my two cents on this. Should’ve been posted over there rather…
I read the cpy of the thread and find it sdisturbing that many of the sellers and buyers there actually defended wearing and / or preferring children’s underwear. I know even VS sells cute girly stuff with flowers and stuff on it, but advertising your panties as children’s is beyond the line which should be drawn in everybody’s head.
That was exactly the issue I had with the girl at the pantyhog auctions. Being small and petite and wearing ‘corresponding’ underwear is NOT the problem. It’s the way some girls advertise them. Please everybody mind your wording!
Absolutely. If you’re that titchy then wearing titchy panties isn’t the problem. Wearing little girl’s panties because you haven’t grown up yourself yet isn’t the problem. In my world there is a wide chasm between size XXXXS and Age 10. Plus don’t little girls’ panties have flowers and Disney characters and puppies on them?
The problem is telling everyone they are children’s underwear. Who the hell do they think is really interested in that apart from the obvious? Why does a grown man want titchy panties? For his titchy cock? Or for his titchy malformed brain?
The problem is wearing them by request. Again, who the hell do they think is interested in that? Who would request a woman to wear not just little panties that happen to fit her – but children’s panties.
Enabling a paedophile to enjoy his fantasies is morally wrong and unforgivable.
I’m researching offender profiling at the moment for my degree and it is very unsettling. Almost every paedophile, or rapist, or serial murderer has previous form. They nearly all started out doing those harmless little things like buying children’s items, flashing or watching women getting undressed, or mildly torturing school friends under the guise of ‘just playing’. All these minor offenses start to escalate. The offender gets braver. He is getting away with cautions, or even remaining undetected, literally getting away with it. So he thinks bigger, takes more risks…and then someone gets hurt – a lot.
Selling little girl’s panties may seem harmless to some but it may be the first rung on a very bad ladder…and at the top there may be a real little girl…
I’ve come to the conclusion that some sellers are just really really thick and need some issues spelling out to them.
March 28, 2008 at 6:07 am #20791SerenaMember‘ve come to the conclusion that some sellers are just really really thick and need some issues spelling out to them.
This happens when you try to reason and spell it out:
If you can’t handle other females selling their items with nothing but good intentions then you are in the wrong place.
Â
How can you garantee that anyone who buys a womans size five or four isn’t doing the same thing? You can’t but you sure don’t sit at home wondering about it when someone doesn’t give you a clue to that having the remote chance of happening.
I don’t think you can reason with such desperate people, nevermind spelling it out, they can’t read. Its sad and makes me shiver.
Let’s just hope that they’ll never have kids of their own, and that our kid will never have the misfortune to get even close to them.:X
March 28, 2008 at 5:17 pm #20799AnnaMemberSo basically the stupid bints are claiming no responsibility?
Selling with good intentions? How naive can somebody get?
It’s sad that money means so much to them.
March 29, 2008 at 7:22 pm #20831AnnaMemberI’m still reading the thread over on Ebanned. How can they be so thick? For some reason they are now arguing that an older woman should be able to pretend to be a younger woman – so it therefore it isn’t paedophilia and Solange and Serena are overreacting. How can a discussion about men wanting little girls’ knickers, and irresponsible women wearing little girls’ knickers for these men turn into a discussion about women wearing pigtails and pretending to be 18… and nobody notice?
Every time I pop over there I am always so much more appreciative of all the lovely sellers over here.
March 29, 2008 at 7:49 pm #20832AnonymousGuestI’ve left a post on that thread on wednesday, didn’t check ,up untill now.
It seems that either they misuderstood the whole thing/or find a remark about size much more important then the ‘big’ problem. That is: buying a panty and having an actual child wear it!!!!!!
It goes on and on about being petite- but not much beings said about the ‘child’ issue.
I don’t know if it’s me or some of them misunderstanding things………………Maybe i’m just tired and mis read/understand things right now…..
Anyway there are some girls over there with good answers/posts on this topic.
I’m not going into that back and forth thing over small sizes, but i did say and will repeat it here again:
There is nothing wrong with being petite.
There’s nothing wrong with hello kitty panties, as i have 2 and bought them in the h&m size small.I have on sheer droopy boyshorts with the droopy in rhinestones. YES I find that cute sometimes. Wether you like lollypops,butterflies or whatever there is on them, there’s nothing wrong with that!
The ‘WRONG’ is that possibly there are some pantysellers that buy panties and have little girlies where them.
The only thing i’ve asked that IF a seller get’s contacted for these type of things that she could give us the heads up!
I certainly don’t want to deal with these type of guys. period!If I ever get contacted for this i will report them to the police instantly- without any type of discussion.
I don’t have children but that doesn’t mean that i should care less! I was a little girl before and i (thank god) never experienced any sexual harrasment and i don’t want to even think about it. One amazin lady on ebanned gave us this link:
http://www.cybertipline.com/
Use it!March 29, 2008 at 8:16 pm #20833AnonymousGuestP.S. I’ve posted that because i know some of them read this forum as well………
March 29, 2008 at 8:59 pm #20836joeMemberI wouldn’t let what is said there bother you too much. There is that same group that likes to start crap. If you said instead that you thought it was a good idea, they’d be screaming that you were a pedo. Some people just get their kicks by talking through their arse on a forum board to start trouble. Look back for the panty trust thread in which these very same trolls were outraged at the thought of a group of sellers doing something to combat fraud and giving buyers a peace of mind.
March 30, 2008 at 8:51 am #20846AnnaMemberjoe wrote:
I wouldn’t let what is said there bother you too much. There is that same group that likes to start crap. If you said instead that you thought it was a good idea, they’d be screaming that you were a pedo. Some people just get their kicks by talking through their arse on a forum board to start trouble. Look back for the panty trust thread in which these very same trolls were outraged at the thought of a group of sellers doing something to combat fraud and giving buyers a peace of mind.
Yes, I noticed the same names too. It doesn’t matter what the topic is they are right and you are wrong. They have decided it and therefore they won’t read what you say. They comment only on what they think you said…and then they congratulate each other on their intelligence.
I noticed that some of the posters were very sensible in their discussion, but they were drowned out by the idiots.
You did the right thing Solange, you know it, we know it but they just don’t want to see it.
March 31, 2008 at 6:01 am #20861SerenaMemberHaven’t been back since the my last post and I’m not planning to either.. I’ve come to the conclusion that it would be an utter waste of time.
Thanks Solange for addressing it 🙂 at least we have names we should watch out for!April 1, 2008 at 8:15 am #20882AnonymousGuestToo bad i never got any names or replies to my pm’s……
However we do know there’s a sicko wanting this, i’d say use the link i’ve posted before and if you’re comfortable with it, name him-so we all know who to watch out for!And no thanks serena- anyone would post something like this. It’s a shame it has to be done, but we have to somewhat protect little children.
April 1, 2008 at 12:22 pm #20891DesireMembersorry what link is it?? did i miss that???:blush:
i agree with you solange to name and shame as long as you are 110% sure that this is not an innocent! i only say that as i have not seen any proof for myself so it is not for me to say! (if that makes sense)
sam xx
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.